Lost Password?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color

SECTION 8 CHICAGO :: Independent Supporters' Association for the Chicago Fire Soccer Club

Friday
Nov 21st
Home arrow Backdraft
Save Your Panic for a Real Crisis Print E-mail
Written by Tom Dunmore   
Friday, 27 June 2008

Chaos! Catastrophe! And a collective vendetta against one of our best players this season thus far.

Such has been the general Fire fan reaction to the recent slide in form, which has seen us drop three of our last four games, with a suddenly anemic offense particularly enraging those who seem to think that despite MLS' undoubted parity, the Fire ought to be immune from the mini-slumps in form every team goes through.

In particular, the criticism roundly heaped upon Chad Barrett following the last game -- where he did botch one easy chance, before missing a far harder angled shot -- has been as pointless as it has been predictable. He deserves criticism, but so do many other players from that disappointing loss to the Fake Goats.

The fact is that Barrett has five goals and three assists in twelve MLS games, a ratio both solid and a considerable improvement upon last season. Barrett has two game winning goals and a game winning assist. He has five goals on 30 shots (compared to 7 on 59 last year). As a point of comparison, Landon Donovan had eight goals on 44 shots last season, almost exactly the same ratio as Chad this year -- did that make America's best a bad player, too? Or Kenny Cooper, who this year has 8 goals on 48 shots?

In fact, looking through every forwards goal-to-shot ratio in MLS, it's hard to find many forwards who have scored as many or more than Barrett at a better ratio, outside of LA and their goal machine. Yes, Chad has frozen twice on easy chances this year. He probably always will miss the odd one like that. But he's making other good opportunities too, and burying them with solid, well-placed shots.

After an offseason where Barrett has clearly benefited from his work with the USMNT U-23s, and after staying late at training working on his shooting, and after starting to play far smarter then in 2007, to focus on the fact that he is not Gary Lineker in front of goal (and never will be, but nor are many worthwhile strikers in MLS) is bizarre.

And focusing on his goalscoring statistics hardly even tells half the story, as Dennis Hamlett made a point to say yesterday:

"Every forward goes through these kinds of stretches. It is important that he got a call from the national team. It came at a good moment, especially after his game against Chivas. I think it was a reward for the hard work he put in the first 10 games of the season. It's nice to see people recognize the work he is doing."

"Strikers are going to go through that. It's not like he missed it on purpose. You just have to continue to work hard. It is not always about scoring goals, even for a striker. Sometimes it is about making the little plays that help your team win."

Ploughing a lone furrow upfront, Barrett has worn himself into the ground every single game in the past month. Doubtless the misses frustrate him as much as they frustrate us; this is why he pounds the turf. But his overall contribution to the team extends beyond his finishing. What he does need if he's alone upfront is more support from attacking mid fielders such as Justin Mapp, who continues to veer between sparkling and soporific.

What Barrett needs on Saturday is our full-throated, hearty support.  Bitching at him -- even if he misses a shot -- will achieve nothing. The same goes for the criticism of CJ Brown after two games back. Yes, he has looked rusty. But let's give the guy a few weeks to get back into the groove before calling for him to be discarded. It's a long, long season.

All that said, your writer will be as frustrated as anyone if the Fire don't break the slump with a great opportunity against an expansion team at home. The Earthquakes have only two wins in their last eleven, and a poor 3-8-2 record overall. That said, they outplayed us in Oakland, and the Fire will do well to come out far more aggressive than they have been in recent games (if someone could wipe the second half of the Chivas USA game from my memory banks with any kind of drug, please let me know).

An injury to Logan Pause should give either Lider Marmol or -- more likely -- Wilman Conde a chance to stake a claim for the midfield destroyer spot (unless we see Diego move up there, and Conde partner Soumare at the back). Segares returns, and boy, have we missed his presence, along with Prideaux; meanwhile, surely it's time to return to two forwards and give Barrett his preferred partner, Chris Rolfe?

What changes would you make if you were Denis Hamlett? 

Trackback(0)
feed7 Comments
eric stephens
June 27, 2008

Well said.
Like I wrote in a post this week, no one is more upset about the goals Chad missed than Chad himself.
Keep your heads up Fire Fans.

Pattrick
June 27, 2008

"(if someone could wipe the second half of the Chivas USA game from my memory banks with any kind of drug, please let me know)."

dibs..... I got that Mawi

well said Tom, I agree that Chad has been play much better this year than last. It has been said that when a player misses and easy chance that it can really hurt the confidence of the team, but Chad's five goals has done a lot to help the team as well. we have 19 points and he owns 6 of them on gwg's. thats all you can ask out of a striker, when the rest of your team cant find the net, you can be there more often than not.

watching Chad miss complete sitters will be the most frustrating thing sense Ben Burton's sex life, but he is by far proven to be our best option.... but if BMcB wants to show Chad how it is done I will let him

Graeme
June 27, 2008

I personally have never been on the Barrett bandwagon - I hope the guy succeeds, don't get me wrong, but his finishing is not the problem. In fact - you highlighted it in this piece: the guy is fragile mentally and the only person who can solve that problem is Chad Barrett.

As a striker myself, I know first hand that you've got to forget the bad shots and focus on your next opportunity, be strong, and finish the next one. Heck, I've missed a few four foot sitters myself that had open nets - I know what that feels like. But Chad, it seems, loads up all the bad shots and lets them get in his way. His stats show better results this year yes, but I personally don't see an improvement in play - in fact, it seems to be downgrading. His work ethic is better & longer thanks to the Gatorade Institute, but now when he gets frustrated he gets tunnel vision & tries to do everything himself - like he's trying to hard to make up for his errors. I think the 2nd half of the Chivas game proves that.

So to answer your question about the lineup changes [now that I've gotten that out of the way], I'd personally put Frankowski up top with Barrett. Let Barrett do the work and let Franko put in the garbage. Blanco as the CAM, Rolfe & Mapp as the wingers, Diego/Marmol as the CDM, and the back line with Brown, Soumare, Sega, & Conde. Anyway, that's my two cents all.

Flanagan
June 27, 2008

"Let Barrett do the work and let Franko put in the garbage." I'd have to say I disagree with that completely. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm sick of the Fire signing aging, physically fragile strikers, paying them a ton of money, and acting like they are doing us a favor. This isn't a slap against Franko. For me, he's a committed, quality guy. Tom and Irish Steve witnessed him giving Conde a bit of a nonverbal rollicking after a Reserves' match recently. Well done, good to hear. I think he's far superior to Wanchope, but I also hope he can shake the injury bug and punch in as many as he possibly can. We simply can't afford to pay any players good money to play but a handful of matches a season. Steve and I recently rewatched the England v Poland match from 2005. Franko was bright, lively, and a constant menace in the box. Let's all hope he can regain that form for us. I'm sure he's desperate to get in there and bang them in. Let's really get behind him, if he gets on tomorrow.

This mentioned, Chad does the work of a lone target man without the frame/height of a traditional target man. Playing up front on your own is the most thankless, difficult task in football (beside goalkeeping). Look at Luca Toni in the Euros. A lone striker suffers at the heads and feet of his midfield's inability to keep possession. If we want Chad to score more goals, our midfield must cherish the ball more, Blanco's contributions must be elevated, and our backline needs to do a better job of playing balls up to foot (not aimless missiles volleyed down the channels). Maybe Chad gets so frustrated, because he's only really getting 2-3 solid chances a match. Also, since when is giving a complete heartfelt fuck about your team a bad thing?

Let's further compare him to Donovan, Cooper, Emilio, Angel, and Twellman (arguably the best strikers in MLS). They all play with foils perfectly suited to their game: Buddle, Oduro, Moreno/Gallardo, Altidore (now gone obviously), and Cristman. Due to our recent inability to play through midfield, Chad has been trying to chase down long balls and bring Blanco into the match.

So, why is everyone slagging Chad? My biggest complaint concerning our recent loses would be our defensive shape. The two DC goals and Cooper's goal were down poor defensive organization. Much of this can be chalked up to a lack of backline continuity forced by injuries, Qualifiers, etc. However, these guys must get minutes on the field, and we've rightly stuggled while players either with less overall experience and/or struggling for fitness have tried to bed themselves into our flow of play. A squad wins trophies, not one striker. I'm glad to see the likes of Washington, Plotkin, Nyarko, CJ and others gettings some real worthwhile minutes. We don't want anyone making their first appeance as sub in the conference finals.

We sing "two Wayne Rooneys," which is funny, because Rooney is notorious for his long goal droughts. The English media as a whole and a tiny, lame section of Man United supporters continually rail him during these stretches. But yet, Man United only lost one match in which he started in this season (@ Chelsea, and he scored a goal). Chad hasn't had the advantages of coming through Everton and England's youth set-ups, or training with the Man United squad and coaching staff 5-days-a-week. So, why do we expect him to produce such performances? More importantly, Chad is growing and improving with and in a young league, club, and soccer playing and appreciating country.

Flanagan
June 27, 2008

(Continued from above)

This mentioned, I will whole heartedly maintain that his first-touch and ability to sheild the ball, and his link-up play and overall decision making when passing the ball are 100% better than at the beginning of last season. Not bad for a young player trying to hone his skills under his third manager in less than a season-and-a-half. Obviously, Bob Bradley has recognized his improvment too, but hey, Bob Bradley is a terrible, short-sighted manager, right?

Anyway, as per my comments on deepening the squad's experience. We're playing the worst team in the league. I say start CJ with Baky, Conde holding midfiled in front of them. Thorrington out on the right, and push Rolfe up with Chad. Let's what those two can do together. I think great things. Then, when we have the lead with about 25 minutes to go (and we will), sub Chad, drop Thorrington alongside Conde, and bring Nyarko in on the right. I think he's got a bright future: good feet and tons of pace. Herron looks like he's finally dropped his excess weight. Thought his runs were great in Dallas, and he looked committed as hell down in Peoria. Maybe even Rolfe on the right and Andy up top with Chad. Haven't heard the final word on Franko's fitness, but hopefully he can soon start playing more of role. Regardless, we have to get CJ some minutes. We're going to need him as the season wears on. Can't wait to see Marmol soon too. Rumor is he's a fucking beast.

20s at Noon and PDLs at 2:30. Hope to see some folks there.

Cheers, everybody. Backdraft should be our first stop for Fire news and views. Let's Stand and Deliver tomorrow night!! Got a big halftime memorial to observe as well. RIP Brandon and Dan!!!

Bahns.
June 28, 2008

I would just like to reiterate the absurdity of the CJ criticism after he has seen such little first team action since his return. Last season he had arugably one of the best years of his career. To call for the end of this Fire Original as he is making his way back from a long injury induced absence is simply shortsighted witch hunting.

If he gets a number of matches under his belt and still doesn't look up to the task, then we can more appropriately dicuss his future with our squad.

Ben
June 28, 2008

I tend to blame the coach before the players, unless a player is simply awful. The coach needs to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of the players he has on the squad and he needs to cater the team to what he has to work with. It's a bit like a chess match, after you've already lost some pieces. You can only rely on the pieces you have.

Chad looks great when he's paired up with another striker. Chad looks great when our midfield retains possession and moves the ball on the ground. I don't think Chad is our biggest problem by a long shot.


Write comment
 
  smaller | bigger
 

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

About Backdraft

Backdraft is written by Fire supporters for Fire supporters. Thanks to access provided by Section 8 Chicago, Backdraft is able to provide an original stream of news, interviews and views on the Chicago Fire soccer club.

If you're interested in contributing to Backdraft, please email communications at section8chicago.com

Tags

Polls

Who should the Fire trade for McBride?
 

Section 8 on Facebook

Section 8 Chicago Facebook Group

Section 8 on Flickr

Section 8 Chicago Flickr Group

Section 8 on YouTube

youtube